Skip to content 
Gymshark exploded onto the fitness scene with influencer firepower and sculpted fits—but it’s no longer the only name on everyone’s leggings. Competitors are rising fast, and the activewear battle is heating up.
Gymshark’s biggest competitors include Alphalete, AYBL, and NVGTN—each targeting similar audiences with different angles like premium pricing, affordability, or female-focused branding. Meanwhile, Lululemon is adapting, and niche brands like DoYouEven are gaining momentum.
I still remember when Gymshark was the underdog. Now, it’s the benchmark. But no brand stays on top forever—and a wave of rivals are using the same tools Gymshark pioneered.
Why Did Gymshark Become a Market Leader?
It wasn’t just the clothes—it was the model. Gymshark rewrote the rules by going direct-to-consumer, tapping into social media early, and making their customers feel seen.
Gymshark became a leader by combining influencer-driven marketing1, seamless product design, and a DTC model2 that gave them speed, agility, and a loyal fanbase.
Minimal Fit Display
Origin Story and DTC Model
Ben Francis started Gymshark from his parents’ home in the UK. He skipped retailers and went straight to the customer.
- Founded: 2012, UK
- Business model: 100% DTC
- Growth engine: Social media and lean startup energy
Social-First Strategy and Influencer Partnerships
This was their true superpower.
- Early partnerships with YouTubers and Instagram athletes
- Ambassador program that drove constant UGC
- Community feel that built emotional loyalty
Signature Product Categories (Seamless Leggings, Fitted Tops)
They launched with fitted men’s wear, but hit big with women’s seamless leggings3.
- Best sellers: Vital Seamless, Flex Leggings
- Key materials: Nylon/spandex blends, seamless knits
- Design vibe: Flattering, performance-meets-lifestyle
Who Are the Top Competitors Challenging Gymshark Today?
These brands are using similar tactics—better fits, stronger visuals, tighter communities—to take a slice of the pie.
Alphalete, AYBL, NVGTN, and Lululemon’s training line are Gymshark’s top challengers, offering similar products with their own unique positioning.
Alphalete – Premium Bodybuilding Edge
Founded by Christian Guzman, Alphalete is Gymshark’s higher-end rival, especially for male athletes.
- Price: Higher than Gymshark
- Vibe: Hardcore, high-performance
- Key product: Amplify leggings, performance shorts
AYBL – Affordable and Women-Focused, UK Origin
AYBL is often called the “budget Gymshark”—and for good reason.
- Price: Lower than Gymshark
- Strength: Trendy, flattering pieces at entry-level pricing
- Audience: Women-first, aesthetic-focused
NVGTN – Influencer-Fueled US Brand with Cult-Like Following
Built entirely on Instagram and TikTok buzz, NVGTN is viral-first.
- Drop model: Limited, high-demand drops
- Product: Seamless sets, scrunch-back leggings
- Community: Gen Z fans, aesthetic workouts
Lululemon (Training Line) – Premium Lifestyle + Gym Hybrid
Lululemon isn’t new—but their training line is a direct Gymshark competitor now.
- Target: Those who want both function and premium feel
- Price point: Significantly higher
- Advantage: Brand trust and global scale
DoYouEven / Jed North / Riderwear – Global Niche Contenders
These brands are smaller but focused.
| Brand | Strength |
|---|---|
| DoYouEven | OG influencer style, Aussie roots |
| Jed North | Bodybuilding cuts, flashy aesthetics |
| Riderwear | Strength sport edge, female collection too |
What Are the Key Points of Comparison?
Let’s break down where each brand wins—and where Gymshark still holds the crown.
Pricing, aesthetics, marketing, and logistics are all battlegrounds. Most brands borrow from the Gymshark playbook—but only some execute well.
Price Tiers & Perceived Value
| Brand | Legging Price | Positioning |
|---|---|---|
| Gymshark | $50–$60 | Balanced value |
| Alphalete | $70–$90 | Premium |
| AYBL | $30–$45 | Affordable |
| NVGTN | $50–$65 | Viral exclusivity |
| Lululemon | $90–$120 | Premium lifestyle |
Product Aesthetics and Function
- Gymshark: Balanced performance + aesthetic
- AYBL/NVGTN: Sculpting, flattering cuts
- Alphalete: Performance-driven, gym-elite
- Lululemon: Clean, premium, minimal
Influencer/Athlete Marketing Strategies
All use influencer content—but with different styles:
- Gymshark: Diverse athlete community
- Alphalete: Elite fitness creators
- NVGTN: TikTok trends, UGC content
- AYBL: Micro-influencers and women-led UGC
Shipping Reach and DTC Capabilities
Gymshark has the global edge.
- Gymshark: Ships worldwide, warehousing in key markets
- AYBL/NVGTN: Mostly US/UK focus
- Alphalete: Global but longer delivery times
- Lululemon: Strong retail + DTC hybrid
Where Does Gymshark Still Lead – and Where Is It Losing Ground?
They’re not invincible. Gymshark leads in community—but it’s feeling the pressure on product innovation and brand freshness.
Gymshark leads in global reach and community. But it’s losing ground in product uniqueness, inclusivity, and Gen Z appeal.
Community Engagement and Brand Loyalty
Their athlete model still works—but newer brands are innovating faster in social content.
- Strength: Community events, brand love
- Weakness: Repetitive influencer content
Size Inclusivity and Female-Focused Ranges
Gymshark has improved, but brands like AYBL and NVGTN offer wider fits for curvier customers.
- AYBL: Curve collections
- NVGTN: Leggings designed to flatter all shapes
Fabric Tech and Product Feedback Loops
Gymshark used to lead—but other brands are catching up.
- Need: More innovative materials
- Opportunity: Listen to product reviews and iterate faster
How Can New Brands Compete in This Space?
There’s still room—if you bring something fresh, focused, and functional.
New brands can compete by offering performance-driven designs, working with expert OEM partners, and leaning into tight, community-focused branding.
Product Development Tips for High-Performance Activewear
Start with:
- Compression fits
- High-waist stability
- Breathable, 4-way stretch fabrics
Finding an OEM/ODM Partner for Seamless Compression Styles
You need someone who can:
- Handle seamlesswear knitting
- Source performance blends
- Offer fast prototyping
At Modaknits, we support startups with all three—plus trend insights and low-MOQ flexibility.
Balancing Quality, Pricing, and Delivery Time
You won’t beat Gymshark on price—but you can win on value.
- Use fewer SKUs at launch
- Focus on 1–2 winning styles
- Invest in clear product photography and fit videos
Building Brand Identity and Trust Without Big Budgets
Community-first branding wins.
- Use micro-influencers
- Highlight real customers
- Build in public—share your startup story
Conclusion
Gymshark may lead today, but competition is fierce. From Alphalete to NVGTN, the landscape is shifting fast. Whether you’re buying or building, the key is clarity: know who you are, who you serve, and why your product matters.
-
Exploring influencer-driven marketing can reveal strategies that brands use to engage audiences and build loyalty, crucial for success in today’s market. ↩
-
Understanding the DTC model can provide insights into how brands like Gymshark achieve success by connecting directly with consumers. ↩
-
Discovering the benefits of seamless leggings can help you understand why they are popular among consumers and how they enhance performance and comfort. ↩
